When should I create a quote revision?
When a meaningful commercial detail such as scope, quantity, price, discount, tax, currency or terms changes.
Lynka guide
A quote revision should preserve what changed, keep the current commercial version obvious and make it possible to trace the customer’s acceptance back to the offer they actually saw.
Negotiation is normal. A customer changes quantity, removes a service, asks for a different term or negotiates price. The problem begins when every change overwrites the old quote or produces another attachment with no reliable version history.
A revision process treats the proposal as a commercial record with history rather than a document file that happens to contain a total.
01
Create a new revision when the commercial offer changes materially: scope, product quantity, price, discount, tax treatment, currency, validity or terms. Minor typographical corrections can follow the company’s own policy.
The important rule is consistency. Customers and internal teams should be able to tell whether they are looking at the same commercial offer as before.
02
Do not delete the earlier offer once the new version exists. The previous revision explains the negotiation and can resolve later questions about what changed.
A preserved history also helps internal review because a manager can compare the current version with what was previously proposed.
03
Only one revision should be treated as the current customer-facing offer. If a newer signing link is issued, older open links should not remain equally actionable.
This protects the commercial process from a customer approving an offer the business has already superseded.
04
If the business requires approval, hold the quote in an internal review state until the price and terms are cleared. Customer signature should not be the mechanism that tells the team a quote was ready.
Approval policy can vary by business; the key principle is to separate internal readiness from customer acceptance.
05
The signing process should refer to the current generated quote document, record the customer decision and preserve enough evidence to understand who acted and what they acted on.
A rejection is also valuable data. It is better than leaving a proposal indefinitely open when the buyer has explicitly declined.
06
The invoice should reflect the agreement the customer accepted rather than a draft that happened to have a similar total. Keeping the source quote relationship makes later questions easier to resolve.
If the invoice itself later needs to be reduced, use the appropriate credit process rather than silently editing the proposal history.
07
Tell the customer that the proposal has been updated and summarize the business-relevant change when appropriate. Avoid sending several active-looking links in the same thread.
A clean customer experience is part of version control: the buyer should know which document deserves attention.
08
Decide what changes require a revision, who can approve the current version, how long a quote remains valid and what happens to superseded customer links.
The policy does not need to be complicated. It needs to prevent the team from inventing a different versioning habit on every deal.
When a meaningful commercial detail such as scope, quantity, price, discount, tax, currency or terms changes.